Content repo for PLU Special Issue #3 - Urgent Publishing
You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.

310 lines
16 KiB

Memes as Means
Report by Sepp Eckenhaussen
![Macintosh HD:Users:rascm:surfdrive:Shared:INC:Projecten:RAAK Making
Public:Pervasive Labour Union zine:UP debris:Chapter Memes:Screen Shot
2019-12-20 at
11.49.55.png](media/image1.png){width="6.259027777777778in"
height="1.2131944444444445in"}
Meme culture can be situated and investigated within a history of online
visual culture and the senses of community in it: selfie culture --
video culture -- meme culture. The notion of 'means' adds several
dimensions to this longer research trajectory, according to Inte
Gloerich, researcher at the Institute of Network Cultures. Apart from
referencing a whole body of dank memes for Marxist teens, it addresses
memes as having financial capacities, and as 'means to an end'. What
kind of (activist) strategies can memes as means inform today? Should we
use them in every way we can, because ends justify means, or can we
employ memes with laser point precision?![Macintosh
HD:Users:rascm:surfdrive:Shared:INC:Projecten:RAAK Making
Public:Pervasive Labour Union zine:UP debris:Chapter Memes:Screen Shot
2019-12-05 at
09.36.08.png](media/image2.png){width="3.4442016622922136in"
height="1.737577646544182in"}![Macintosh
HD:Users:rascm:surfdrive:Shared:INC:Projecten:RAAK Making
Public:Pervasive Labour Union zine:UP debris:Chapter Memes:Screen Shot
2019-12-20 at
12.08.53.png](media/image3.png){width="2.254861111111111in"
height="1.0567169728783903in"}
If memes are considered to be means, the question of their meaning is
given new urgency. What kind of meaning is implied in the means-being of
memes? How meaningful is it to decipher their ever-changing meanings and
to partake in the land-grabbing of symbols? Can we hold public figures
accountable for their adherence to memes, as if they represent some
fixed meaning? Is it possible to start creating online digital symbols
anew, and if so, how?
There are also questions of authorship and ownership over these means.
Crediting meme-makers (or Memelords) becomes more widespread on the left
flank of the political spectrum, which suggests that memes are no longer
considered as post-author entities. What does that mean under the rule
of Article 13? What will be the relation between more severe copyrights
and the anonymous army? Is there a chance of meme revenue models, of
being paid for previously unpaid work? Is it time to unionize meme-work?
Is meming a matter of being professional or of fighting a trench war?
**Article 13**
Evelyn Austin, who works at [[Bits of
Freedom]{.underline}](https://www.bitsoffreedom.nl/) and [[The
Hmm]{.underline}](https://thehmm.nl/), considers digital human rights
such as freedom of publishing and distributing in the context of Article
13. The internet has always carried the promise to empower the
powerless, and indeed it does empower. But as it usually goes with means
of empowerment, the internet also empowers the already powerful -- and
this latter group is catching up.
Many examples show the hampering of communication of suppressed groups
by those in power: Facebook took down pictures of Femen in Yemen on
basis of nudity regulations; Dutch pro-choice organization WomenOnWaves
were blocked in Ireland four times in the run-up of abortion referendum;
YouTube videos with the word 'trans' in their titles are systematically
categorized as 'adult'.
This shows that there is a need for different modes of publishing and
for alternative platforms, but also for new strategies of communication
and distribution. We need good, strong, and wide networks of digital
rights organizations and journalists. What we got is Article 13.
![](media/image4.png){width="2.5104166666666665in" height="4.625in"} So,
what exactly is Article 13 again? The article (which in the end turned
into Article 17) makes platforms and other 'hosts' accountable for what
users are saying on their site. An individual's speech on a company's
website is automatically the company's speech. This is of course
threatening to companies, and there are two solutions to the threat:
1\. Licensing agreements with rights' holders (however, so many
different users use so much different and often mixed content in so many
ways, that it would be nearly impossible to come to sufficient
agreements in all cases).
2\. Upload filters (but, making filtering software is hard and
expensive). This means that all of our content will be monitored and
filtered, with the result that one's speech is from now on only free
online insofar as you can prove that it's allowed to be, instead of the
other way around. With this new regulation, governments are allowing
companies to discipline citizens in a way that they're not allowed to do
themselves.
Thus, we find ourselves in a complicated situation. We can try to
abandon the big platforms and go to alternatives, but not everyone is in
the privileged position to do so. Realistically, we're stuck with the
big platforms for now. This means there will be loads and loads of
frustration about filters of 'possible' terrorism, child abuse, nudity,
etc. At the same time, \#gamergate, as an example of how heteronormative
white male power was in the end subverted, shows that we have to remain
critical and that we do have the means to change things even in
mainstream media.
**Trolling Together**
![Macintosh HD:Users:rascm:surfdrive:Shared:INC:Projecten:RAAK Making
Public:Pervasive Labour Union zine:UP debris:Chapter Memes:Screen Shot
2019-12-20 at
12.09.40.png](media/image5.png){width="3.9649945319335083in"
height="0.6805555555555556in"}
Cultural worker and avid troll Clara Balaguer has been occupied with
online troll wars against the rise of authoritarianism in the
Philippines for years. Two years ago, it became untenable to do critical
cultural programming in the Philippines for under-served communities and
Clara decided to come to the Netherlands. In the inevitable comparison
of these two countries, it is clear that the levels of 'urgency'
generally felt in the Netherlands are much lower than those in the
Philippines, because of the cloudy cuteness, order, and privilege we
have here. Reflecting her experiences as troll in the Philippines, Clara
shared five aphorisms with the predominantly Dutch public:
*1. Nobody gives a shit about your kerning, but graphic design is
important. *A lot of activists are hold-overs from the 70s (baby boomers
trying to understand what's happening online). We have to understand
that memes should not look like professionally designed (and paid-for)
posters, because that makes them less trustworthy. Making 'nice'
stuff does not work anymore. Professional designers: demodernize and
decolonize!
![Macintosh HD:Users:rascm:surfdrive:Shared:INC:Projecten:RAAK Making
Public:Pervasive Labour Union zine:UP debris:Chapter Memes:Screen Shot
2019-12-05 at
09.45.04.png](media/image6.png){width="4.530627734033246in"
height="0.8379625984251968in"}
*2. Trolling is a ladylike pursuit. *The idea many people hold of the
troll is a neck-beard guy trolling for the lulz in his mom's basement.
But when ideology comes into play (political trolling), the
alternatively gendered and women become way more active. Pro-Duterte
trolling in the Philippines is dominated by female and non-conforming
voices. This success is because the purple-color workforce controls pop
culture language and is used to role-switching (in terms of gender,
etc.).
*3. Outside of the echo chamber, check yourself (you are not immune to
neurolinguistics programming). *No-one is immune to dogpiling,
especially when it's a durational process. Never assume that you're
above the narcotic effects of being outside of your echo chamber. Still,
also from a position of privilege, we have to engage. Let the energy
course through you. Use the troll as platform. There has to be that
counter-voice, which protects those who feel depressed and alone in a
toxic environment. This is where the organic discourse is made.
*4. Meatspace is just as important as cyberspace for the troll
farmer. *Don't stick to fingertip activism but go to conventions and
meet-ups. You have to be present physically as well. We can troll
together, run organic troll farms. Trolls are not feeding on the
opposition, but on their own community. They will grow. So, we should
also get communities involved. Families that troll together will survive
together.
*5. You are what you eat, a.k.a. trolling is an embodied, physical
experience. *Trolling is exhausting and stressful, and it can be
harmful. Consciousness about food and drink consumption influences the
troll experience. Learn when to stop. Learn how to exit the vortex.
Confuse yourself.
**Meming Back**
Isabel Löfgren, a Swedish-Brazilian artist and educator currently based
in Stockholm, took up the theme of memefascism vs. autonomous zones of
resistance in Brazil. The fact that memes are a serious means is very
clear by the fact that Jair Bolsonaro has been elected president thanks
mostly to 'bolsominions': an army of trolls campaigning for Bolsonaro
through WhatsApp. Because of this politicization of WhatsApp, everyone
started creating an enormous overflow of public political expressions.
Jair Bolsonaro has even claimed to be, next to president, the official
controller of memes.
This situation also shows us something about the so-called post-truth
condition. Studies show that half of the troll messages during the
election campaign came from WhatsApp family groups. This signals that,
first, it's not about truth but about trust, and, second, that the
crisis of authority in relation to truth effectively splits families and
social structures as we know them.
A family that is certainly not split is the Bolsonaro family. Father
Jair and his three sons are in power together, all four of them
fulfilling elected positions. One son, Carlos, is fully occupied with
the control of all social media accounts connected to the presidency. In
the presidential palace, there is even an official social media farm.
The most successful bloggers and vloggers from the campaign are hired to
work here for Bolsonaro's official PR bureau. Together, they effectively
create a bombardment of disinformation.
![Macintosh HD:Users:rascm:surfdrive:Shared:INC:Projecten:RAAK Making
Public:Pervasive Labour Union zine:UP
debris:debris\_new:images:photo-Memes-Isabel-FB\_post\_8.JPG](media/image7.jpeg){width="4.5in"
height="1.4044717847769028in"}
However, Bolsonaro's disinformation and repression of minority voices is
not unbreakable. When, during carnival, black, poor, and gay voices let
themselves be heard on the streets, Bolsonaro [[started tweeting about
golden
showers]{.underline}](https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/president-bolsonaro-shocks-brazil-golden-shower-tweet-n980476),
subsequently asking: What is a golden shower? He was met with cunning
and humor, when Twitter and Facebook accounts named Golden Shower
started asking: What is Jair Bolsonaro?
![Macintosh HD:Users:rascm:surfdrive:Shared:INC:Projecten:RAAK Making
Public:Pervasive Labour Union zine:UP
debris:debris\_new:images:photo-Memes-Isabel-Golden\_shower\_1.JPG](media/image8.jpeg){width="3.242240813648294in"
height="3.1990737095363078in"}
In fact, this type of humorous grass-roots mobilization is a consistent
trend in Brazil. Already during the election campaign, women, black
people, and other minorities repressed by Bolsonaro came together in the
Not Him-campaign (\#elenão), which was huge and powerful.
\#elenão was followed by a storm of other resistant trends and movements
on social media, including \#MarielleFranco, \#éalei, \@coleraalegeria,
\@PretaLab, and \@Designativista.
Bringing the point back to memes as means, it is clear that the
far-right kidnaps forms and thereby subverts democracy, but that
counter-meming can be a powerful means of the Left, too. The questions
that rise for the audience of Urgent Publishing include: How to level
out this battlefield of meme-wars? What is the role of poetic justice in
memes? How can art collapse meaning and contribute to meming?
![Macintosh HD:Users:rascm:surfdrive:Shared:INC:Projecten:RAAK Making
Public:Pervasive Labour Union zine:UP debris:Chapter Memes:Screen Shot
2019-12-20 at
12.09.28.png](media/image9.png){width="3.375774278215223in"
height="0.5787040682414698in"}
**Memes Will Be Memes**
A last contribution to the panel was made by Silvia dal Dusso and Noel
David Nicolaus, as representatives
of [[Clusterduck]{.underline}](http://clusterduck.space/), a hypergeeky
online environment for the study, production, and exploration of memes.
![](media/image10.png){width="2.2319444444444443in"
height="3.125in"}Memes cannot be reduced to a consistent explanation, as
mainstream media often try to do. For example, the narrative of the
American election running from alt-right fascist sentiments living on
social media, to Trump endorsing these memes, to Hillary falling into
the troll trap, to Russian bots intervening in the campaign is as nicely
linear as it is wildly inaccurate. Have we completely forgotten that
there were also Berniepepes? To really understand memes, we have to go
deeper into the actual images and see how they're currently used as
means.
There are a ton of major stories in meme history that remain almost
completely unknown to the wider public. We know the Great Meme War,
Gamergate, 4chan, and maybe LeftBook, but hardly anyone knows about
phenomena like Gondola or Griffy. (For more information, check Jules
Durand's [[Meme
Manifesto]{.underline}](http://www.iamthefamous.me/fame-and-power.html),
which will be published by Clusterduck.)
The history of memes is a history of exodus, in which meme communities
migrate from one medium to another. The most recent major example would
be memelords changing to Instagram after Tumblr changed its terms of
use. (Side note: why don't we migrate from FB?)
Even though there seems to be some agency in this mobility of
communities, it is a complicated issue. At present, there is an on-going
effort to make a memers' union, to start protecting the authorial rights
of meme-makers from expropriators like fuckjerry. The initiative went
viral and was picked up on by the media. And it's not just a prank:
there is an actual, functional website, where anyone can join the union.
However, despite media coverage, the union itself has not been very
successful in terms of members. And even when large numbers of users
change their behavior, such as during \#thezuccening, this might still
have very little impact on the megascale of social media today.
![](media/image11.png){width="1.3076388888888888in" height="5.75in"}The
discussion around memes as means comes down to one lesson, which is as
powerful as it is simple: democracy is not a given. Fascism is a
reality, which has to be faced. It is time for the Left to stop being
disdainful to the means of memes, to co-opting, and to organization,
because this why the Right is winning right now. The Right organizes,
has money (which comes with being in power), doesn't claim a moral
high-ground, and is willing to accept pluralism. We should not give in
to the instantism we're being pushed into by dominant modes of
knowledge-producers, but start taking back initiative, and: start to
troll.
![Macintosh HD:Users:rascm:surfdrive:Shared:INC:Projecten:RAAK Making
Public:Pervasive Labour Union zine:UP debris:Chapter Memes:Screen Shot
2019-12-20 at
11.56.22.png](media/image12.png){width="6.259027777777778in"
height="0.9534722222222223in"}![Macintosh
HD:Users:rascm:surfdrive:Shared:INC:Projecten:RAAK Making
Public:Pervasive Labour Union zine:UP debris:Chapter Memes:Screen Shot
2019-12-20 at
11.56.06.png](media/image13.png){width="6.259027777777778in"
height="1.4076388888888889in"}
![Macintosh HD:Users:rascm:surfdrive:Shared:INC:Projecten:RAAK Making
Public:Pervasive Labour Union zine:UP debris:Chapter Memes:Screen Shot
2019-12-20 at 11.55.14.png](media/image14.png){width="6.25in"
height="1.8243055555555556in"}
![Macintosh HD:Users:rascm:surfdrive:Shared:INC:Projecten:RAAK Making
Public:Pervasive Labour Union zine:UP debris:Chapter Memes:Screen Shot
2019-12-20 at 11.55.39.png](media/image15.png){width="6.25in"
height="3.111111111111111in"}