11 changed files with 237 additions and 69 deletions
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 1.1 KiB |
@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ |
|||
Title: Infrastructure mega corridors: a way out (or in) to the crisis? |
|||
Author: Recommon |
|||
|
|||
*"Infrastructure mega corridors: a way out (or in) to the crisis?"* |
|||
|
|||
*Translated from an original blogpost in Italian by Elena Gerebizza and |
|||
Filippo Taglieri from Re:Common introducing their new report: ["The |
|||
great illusion. Special economic zones and infrastructure |
|||
mega-corridors, the way to |
|||
go?"](https://web.archive.org/web/20200814132820/https://www.recommon.org/la-grande-illusione/)* |
|||
|
|||
In the last few months our lives have changed dramatically. Many of us |
|||
lost their jobs while many others continued working under extreme |
|||
conditions. Inequality and social injustices have become increasingly |
|||
visible features of the economic system and the society in which we |
|||
live. |
|||
|
|||
The pandemic might have impacted everyone's life, but it has not |
|||
affected everyone in the same way. Among the sectors that did not |
|||
suffer, but rather benefited from the crisis, are online platforms such |
|||
as Amazon and the likes. Those sectors have become the vehicles for the |
|||
transfer from "real life" to a virtual dimension for our working, |
|||
schooling, sporting and socialising. Fortunately, many have been |
|||
questioning what the implications of all this would be; including what |
|||
might happen to the data generated by our online lives; by whom and how |
|||
is this data being treated; and what are the implications? This is a |
|||
debate that we hope will remain open, since it concerns aspects that are |
|||
not contingent to the health crisis, but are instead key factors in the |
|||
reorganization of "the extractivist society". A society that enables a |
|||
few elites to extract more and more material and financial wealth from |
|||
the territories and local communities that inhabit them, effectively |
|||
expropriating them from the power to decide upon their own lives. |
|||
|
|||
While most ongoing conversations center around the health crisis and the |
|||
resulting recession, we want to bring attention to the systemic |
|||
reorganization that is taking place as we speak. We are talking about a |
|||
process that began before the pandemic, a new way of organizing large |
|||
infrastructure according to the logics of mega-corridors, to reduce time |
|||
and space, with the aim of continuously increasing profits on an |
|||
increasing scale in the face of a slowdown in the growth of global |
|||
trade. This process, which remains only partly visible, is highly |
|||
energy-intensive and rooted in the fossil fuel economy, involving the |
|||
construction of new high-speed railways for the transport of goods, port |
|||
terminals, data centres and power stations, as well as new logistics |
|||
centres covering hundreds of hectares. All this implies a radical and |
|||
irreversible transformation of territories for the benefit of large |
|||
private capital, where ports and production areas identified as "free |
|||
trade", or "Special Economic Zones" (SEZs), all become interconnected. |
|||
|
|||
What are the manifestations in Italy and Europe of this global capital |
|||
agenda? How will it change the social, economic and productive structure |
|||
of our country and the continent? What impact will it have on the |
|||
climate and the environment, two central areas where failures and |
|||
systemic contradictions are already very visible? The question is partly |
|||
rhetorical: it is difficult to imagine a "globalization 2.0" which will |
|||
accelerate production, transport and consumption of goods at an |
|||
unprecedented speed while at the same time profoundly reduce the |
|||
systemic impact on the environment and climate, an impact that goes far |
|||
beyond proposed calculations of direct and indirect emissions generated. |
|||
|
|||
Will the major infrastructure mega-corridors plan be challenged in the |
|||
post-pandemic economic crisis or will the current crisis be an excuse to |
|||
accelerate it? Will its overall impact be properly assessed? This |
|||
remains doubtful since harmful impacts of the global infrastructure |
|||
agenda are so far considered as the least of their problems by investors |
|||
and policy makers dazzled by forecasts and data about the production, |
|||
logistics and global trade that is starting again. |
|||
|
|||
How does this infrastructure masterplan meet the needs of the millions |
|||
of people who are already paying the highest costs of a profit-driven |
|||
model at all costs? How does it meet the needs of communities that will |
|||
be removed from their lands to make way for new mega infrastructure? How |
|||
will it make our societies more resilient to the great droughts, |
|||
typhoons, and increasingly heavy rains? How will it counteract the |
|||
increasing cementing of the most densely populated areas and how will it |
|||
enable everyone to have a roof over their heads? |
|||
|
|||
We believe that it is high time to open up to such far-reaching |
|||
questions. |
|||
|
|||
The original article and link to the report can be found |
|||
[[here]{.underline}](https://web.archive.org/web/20200814132820/https://www.recommon.org/la-grande-illusione/). |
|||
Loading…
Reference in new issue