diff --git a/content/favicon.ico b/content/favicon.ico
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..19417f5
Binary files /dev/null and b/content/favicon.ico differ
diff --git a/content/infrastructure_megacorridors_recommon-org.md b/content/infrastructure_megacorridors_recommon-org.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..cd74601
--- /dev/null
+++ b/content/infrastructure_megacorridors_recommon-org.md
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+Title: Infrastructure mega corridors: a way out (or in) to the crisis?
+Author: Recommon
+
+*"Infrastructure mega corridors: a way out (or in) to the crisis?"*
+
+*Translated from an original blogpost in Italian by Elena Gerebizza and
+Filippo Taglieri from Re:Common introducing their new report: ["The
+great illusion. Special economic zones and infrastructure
+mega-corridors, the way to
+go?"](https://web.archive.org/web/20200814132820/https://www.recommon.org/la-grande-illusione/)*
+
+In the last few months our lives have changed dramatically. Many of us
+lost their jobs while many others continued working under extreme
+conditions. Inequality and social injustices have become increasingly
+visible features of the economic system and the society in which we
+live.
+
+The pandemic might have impacted everyone's life, but it has not
+affected everyone in the same way. Among the sectors that did not
+suffer, but rather benefited from the crisis, are online platforms such
+as Amazon and the likes. Those sectors have become the vehicles for the
+transfer from "real life" to a virtual dimension for our working,
+schooling, sporting and socialising. Fortunately, many have been
+questioning what the implications of all this would be; including what
+might happen to the data generated by our online lives; by whom and how
+is this data being treated; and what are the implications? This is a
+debate that we hope will remain open, since it concerns aspects that are
+not contingent to the health crisis, but are instead key factors in the
+reorganization of "the extractivist society". A society that enables a
+few elites to extract more and more material and financial wealth from
+the territories and local communities that inhabit them, effectively
+expropriating them from the power to decide upon their own lives.
+
+While most ongoing conversations center around the health crisis and the
+resulting recession, we want to bring attention to the systemic
+reorganization that is taking place as we speak. We are talking about a
+process that began before the pandemic, a new way of organizing large
+infrastructure according to the logics of mega-corridors, to reduce time
+and space, with the aim of continuously increasing profits on an
+increasing scale in the face of a slowdown in the growth of global
+trade. This process, which remains only partly visible, is highly
+energy-intensive and rooted in the fossil fuel economy, involving the
+construction of new high-speed railways for the transport of goods, port
+terminals, data centres and power stations, as well as new logistics
+centres covering hundreds of hectares. All this implies a radical and
+irreversible transformation of territories for the benefit of large
+private capital, where ports and production areas identified as "free
+trade", or "Special Economic Zones" (SEZs), all become interconnected.
+
+What are the manifestations in Italy and Europe of this global capital
+agenda? How will it change the social, economic and productive structure
+of our country and the continent? What impact will it have on the
+climate and the environment, two central areas where failures and
+systemic contradictions are already very visible? The question is partly
+rhetorical: it is difficult to imagine a "globalization 2.0" which will
+accelerate production, transport and consumption of goods at an
+unprecedented speed while at the same time profoundly reduce the
+systemic impact on the environment and climate, an impact that goes far
+beyond proposed calculations of direct and indirect emissions generated.
+
+Will the major infrastructure mega-corridors plan be challenged in the
+post-pandemic economic crisis or will the current crisis be an excuse to
+accelerate it? Will its overall impact be properly assessed? This
+remains doubtful since harmful impacts of the global infrastructure
+agenda are so far considered as the least of their problems by investors
+and policy makers dazzled by forecasts and data about the production,
+logistics and global trade that is starting again.
+
+How does this infrastructure masterplan meet the needs of the millions
+of people who are already paying the highest costs of a profit-driven
+model at all costs? How does it meet the needs of communities that will
+be removed from their lands to make way for new mega infrastructure? How
+will it make our societies more resilient to the great droughts,
+typhoons, and increasingly heavy rains? How will it counteract the
+increasing cementing of the most densely populated areas and how will it
+enable everyone to have a roof over their heads?
+
+We believe that it is high time to open up to such far-reaching
+questions.
+
+The original article and link to the report can be found
+[[here]{.underline}](https://web.archive.org/web/20200814132820/https://www.recommon.org/la-grande-illusione/).
diff --git a/content/zabala_warning.md b/content/zabala_warning.md
index f83c37e..f0fedd8 100644
--- a/content/zabala_warning.md
+++ b/content/zabala_warning.md
@@ -1,3 +1,6 @@
+Title: The Philosophy of Warnings
+Author: Santiago Zabala
+
Santiago Zabala
***The Philosophy of Warnings***
diff --git a/output/archives.html b/output/archives.html
index a331173..d53c954 100644
--- a/output/archives.html
+++ b/output/archives.html
@@ -1,13 +1,14 @@
- AMRO_2020_publication - Archives
+ AMRO 2020 Publication - Archives
+
-
-
-
+
+
+
@@ -27,16 +28,20 @@
-