ccl
3 years ago
12 changed files with 63 additions and 54 deletions
@ -1,14 +1,18 @@ |
|||
Title: Introduction: Deb Verhoeven |
|||
Slug: 02-s1-introduction-deb-verhoeven |
|||
Date: 2020-11-01 12:01 |
|||
Summary: |
|||
Summary: Deb Verhoeven's work explores the intersection between cinema studies and other disciplines such as history, information management, geo-spatial science, statistics, urban studies and economics. |
|||
|
|||
Deb Verhoeven first introduced the term *infrapuncture* in 2016 at a Digital Humanities conference in Oxford. In her talk she gives the example of the Greek and Italian cinemas that appeared in Melbourne before the invention of the video tape and the influence they have had over the influx and organisation of the Italian and Greek immigrants living in Australia at the time. Her research concluded that these small cinemas that only screened subtitled Italian and Greek movies led to an increase in migrant population from those areas. Similarly, the shutting down of a cinema coincided with the dispersion of the immigrant community in the neighbourhood. |
|||
Deb Verhoeven is the Canada 150 Research Chair in Gender and Cultural Informatics at the University of Alberta. She is the Director of the Humanities Networked Infrastructure project[^huni], a linked data initiative which brings together datasets from multiple Australian cultural organisations into one database. Verhoeven's work explores the intersection between cinema studies and other disciplines such as history, information management, geo-spatial science, statistics, urban studies and economics. |
|||
|
|||
In the following video contributions, Deb Verhoeven will unpack the term *infrapunctures*. She will explore how it is a useful departure point for infrastructural change that is beneficial for the communities who uses them. We invited Deb Verhoeven to respond to the following questions: |
|||
In the following video contributions, Deb Verhoeven will unpack the term *infrapunctures*. She will explore how it is a useful departure point for infrastructural change that is beneficial for the communities who uses them. We invited her to respond to the following questions: |
|||
|
|||
* What are digital infrapunctures? |
|||
* How do we identify stress points in digital infrastructures? |
|||
* Who can create infrapunctures? |
|||
* Could you expand on the analogy of acupuncture in relation to infrastructures? |
|||
* Could you give some examples of infrapunctural interventions? |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
# Footnotes |
|||
[^huni]: Humanities Networked Infrastructure. Last accessed 9th November 2020. <https://huni.net.au/#/search> |
|||
|
@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ |
|||
Title: Bots as Digital Infrapunctures |
|||
Title: Bots as Digital Infrapunctures |
|||
Slug: 05-s6-step-5 |
|||
Date: 2020-11-01 12:05 |
|||
Summary: End of the module |
|||
|
|||
The end of the module has been reached now. The term *digital infrapunctures* leaves us with potentialities and possibilities to critically engage with digital infrastructures, that ask for further unfolding and experimentation. Infrapunctures can be small. Every intervention can tigger bigger ones. To make sure that we can rely on truly fair operating infrastructures, we need a whole range of actions that expose infrastructural stress points. Could these include activistic bots marking hurt? Poetic bots proposing alternative readings? Or annoying bots asking for attention? |
|||
We have reached the end of the module. The term *digital infrapunctures* leaves us with possibilities to critically engage with digital infrastructures, that ask for further unfolding and experimentation. Infrapunctures can be small. Every intervention can trigger bigger ones. To make sure that we can rely on truly fair operating infrastructures, we need a whole range of actions that expose infrastructural stress points. Could these include activist bots marking hurt? Poetic bots proposing alternative readings? Or annoying bots asking for attention? |
|||
|
|||
Eventually however, when we zoom out a bit, the question that we should attent to first is the following: |
|||
Eventually however, when we zoom out a bit, the question that we should attend to first is the following: |
|||
|
|||
In a time of infrastructural complexity, do you put your effort into destabilizing an existing system where the hurt is already beyond reparation or do you use your energy to punctuate another space that at least attempts to do things ethically and has the potential to provide agency over their tranformations to a broader group of people? |
|||
|
Loading…
Reference in new issue