mb
/
bots-as-digital-infrapunctures
1
1
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity
This is the repository for the online module Bots as Digital Infrapuncture, commissioned by the Utrecht University
You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
128 Commits
1 Branch
0 Tags
10 MiB
 
 
 
 
 
Tree: 35c9178691
Branches Tags
${ item.name }
Create tag ${ searchTerm }
Create branch ${ searchTerm }
from '35c9178691'
${ noResults }
bots-as-digital-infrapunctures/content/Section 3 - Bots/1-introduction.md

2.8 KiB
Raw Blame History

Title: Introduction: Bots Slug: 01-s3-introduction Date: 2020-11-01 12:00 Summary: What type of bots are being made?

Until now we have been referring to digital infrastructures. However, bots they are mostly contextualised as being active on a platform. In many ways digital infrastructures and platforms overlap in their invisibility, broad public usage, or extensibility. According to Platin et al (2016), both ways of framing offer helpful elements to each other. We are witnessing a platformisation of infrastructure in tandem with an infrastructuralisation of platforms through information technologies, where on the one hand, infrastructures start to splinter into services taken over by private enterprises, and on the other hand, platforms start taking on more responsibilities which were previously managed by the government. 1. For the purposes of this online module, we are interested in the programmability (the capacity to go beyond the original designers' intention) and affordances (what is allowed ) of platforms combined with the public interest and responsibility of infrastructures. However, in order to highlight the importance of tools made solely for the purpose of optimising for a public, and not for corporate profit, we will from now on refer to platforms as digital communication infrastructures. Doing so avoids the ambiguity of describing the continual reparation of systems and their ecology as health. We are interested in the potential of bots to repair in the benefit of one or multiple publics.

Having just unfolded what infrastructural harms could be, we now move to exploring bots. When we say bots, we refer to software agents which automatise certain actions and can run autonomously or semi-autonomously. Some of the most mentioned examples are voice assistants such as Alexa or Siri, but they can also be web crawlers indexing the web or bots maintaining Wikipedia.

The particular bots we are interested in for this online module are those that act as an interface between the digital platform and human users, or what Andreas Hepp calls communicative robots2, robots that "are defined as autonomously operating systems designed for the purpose of quasi-communication with human beings to enable further algorithmic-based functionalities – often but not always on the basis of artificial intelligence" [page numbers].

In this section, we will introduce Andreas Hepp, professor of media and communications at the ZeMKI, University of Bremen.

Footnotes

  1. Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook. ↩︎

  2. Hepp, Andreas. "Artificial companions, social bots and work bots: communicative robots as research objects of media and communication studies" Media, Culture & Society Volume 42 (2020): 1410-1426. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0163443720916412 ↩︎