mb
/
bots-as-digital-infrapunctures
1
1
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity
This is the repository for the online module Bots as Digital Infrapuncture, commissioned by the Utrecht University
You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
109 Commits
1 Branch
0 Tags
10 MiB
 
 
 
 
 
Tree: 8d445c2ba9
Branches Tags
${ item.name }
Create tag ${ searchTerm }
Create branch ${ searchTerm }
from '8d445c2ba9'
${ noResults }
bots-as-digital-infrapunctures/content/Section 5 - Infrapunctural .../4-step-3.md

1.1 KiB
Raw Blame History

Title: Step 3: Infrapunctures Slug: 04-s5-step-3 Date: 2020-11-01 12:03 Summary: Continuation of the excercise.


Outline a bot that tackles a specific hurt you have identified in the digital communication infrastructure you chose previously. Follow the following questions, write your answers down.

Identify a hurt concerning (lack of) agency, impact or power in relation to how your group communicates.

How could a bot intervene? In other words, how could it punctuate?

Some (non-exhaustive) attributes of bot (programmatic) behaviour:

  • iteration
  • repetition
  • storing
  • versioning
  • amplification
  • ...

Look at the questions below and pick a few to answer.

  • What roles can be picked up by a bot? Is the bot for example a janitor, gardener, reporter?
  • In what way is the bot conducive to the well-being of the group?
  • What modes of interaction does the bot use? Is the bot for example witnessing, listening, gathering, greeting, sparking, whispering, reminding, shouting?