diff --git a/collective-work-practices-living/index.html b/collective-work-practices-living/index.html index 2381ba7..51872ca 100644 --- a/collective-work-practices-living/index.html +++ b/collective-work-practices-living/index.html @@ -15,12 +15,16 @@ video {width:640px;max-height:640px;} body{ #background-color: pink; + margin-top:calc(6px + 1em); } body > a { position: fixed; - top: 10px; - left: 31px; - color:magenta; + top: 0; + left: 0; + color: white; + background-color: fuchsia; + width: 100%; + padding: 3px 10px; } div{ max-width: 520px; @@ -54,15 +58,45 @@ figcaption, a{ word-break: break-word; } +blockquote{ + margin:3em 0; + padding:0; + font-style:italic; +} +
bishop-claire-artificial-hells-participatory-art-and-politics-spectatorship01.png
intersections-of-care-guidelines.png
-
Ivan Illich, Conviviality_1973.png
-
Queering_Damage_01.png
-
Queering_Damage_02.png
-
bishop-claire-artificial-hells-participatory-art-and-politics-spectatorship.png
+
ivan-illich_Conviviality_1973.png
+
queering_damage01.png
+
queering_damage02.png
+
riot-grrrl-manifesto-snippet-1.png
+
riot-grrrl-manifesto-snippet-2.png
+
riot-grrrl-manifesto-snippet-3.png
+
sources.md
+
+ + + + + + sources + + + +

Sources

+

Tools of Conviviality, Ivan Illich (197?) https://kok.memoryoftheworld.org/Ivan%20Illich/Tools%20of%20Conviviality%20(476)/Tools%20of%20Conviviality%20-%20Ivan%20Illich.pdf

+

Riot Grrrls Manifesto (1989) https://www.historyisaweapon.com/defcon1/riotgrrrlmanifesto.html

+ + +
../ diff --git a/collective-work-practices-living/Ivan Illich_Conviviality_1973.png b/collective-work-practices-living/ivan-illich_Conviviality_1973.png similarity index 100% rename from collective-work-practices-living/Ivan Illich_Conviviality_1973.png rename to collective-work-practices-living/ivan-illich_Conviviality_1973.png diff --git a/collective-work-practices-living/riot-grrrl-manifesto-snippet-1.png b/collective-work-practices-living/riot-grrrl-manifesto-snippet-1.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000..be20c52 Binary files /dev/null and b/collective-work-practices-living/riot-grrrl-manifesto-snippet-1.png differ diff --git a/collective-work-practices-living/riot-grrrl-manifesto-snippet-2.png b/collective-work-practices-living/riot-grrrl-manifesto-snippet-2.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9c9e5c1 Binary files /dev/null and b/collective-work-practices-living/riot-grrrl-manifesto-snippet-2.png differ diff --git a/collective-work-practices-living/riot-grrrl-manifesto-snippet-3.png b/collective-work-practices-living/riot-grrrl-manifesto-snippet-3.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000..da454cd Binary files /dev/null and b/collective-work-practices-living/riot-grrrl-manifesto-snippet-3.png differ diff --git a/collective-work-practices-living/sources.md b/collective-work-practices-living/sources.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..4cf133d --- /dev/null +++ b/collective-work-practices-living/sources.md @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +# Sources + +Tools of Conviviality, Ivan Illich (197?) + +Riot Grrrls Manifesto (1989) + + diff --git a/collective-work-practices-living/sources.md.html b/collective-work-practices-living/sources.md.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..f6bc47f --- /dev/null +++ b/collective-work-practices-living/sources.md.html @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ + + + + + + + sources + + + +

Sources

+

Tools of Conviviality, Ivan Illich (197?) https://kok.memoryoftheworld.org/Ivan%20Illich/Tools%20of%20Conviviality%20(476)/Tools%20of%20Conviviality%20-%20Ivan%20Illich.pdf

+

Riot Grrrls Manifesto (1989) https://www.historyisaweapon.com/defcon1/riotgrrrlmanifesto.html

+ + diff --git a/free-culture-confusions-and-misunderstanding.md b/free-culture-confusions-and-misunderstanding.md index c0962ea..fffb908 100644 --- a/free-culture-confusions-and-misunderstanding.md +++ b/free-culture-confusions-and-misunderstanding.md @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ # Free culture +
There is so much confusion and misunderstanding about all these elements because they manifest and materialise differently at several levels, via a process of rationalisation that leads to the fragmentation of cultural freedom into new codes of meaning, the ideological and emotional nature of which can be contradictory to or incompatible with each other. As a consequence, free culture ends up being simply many different things at once: @@ -9,5 +10,6 @@ of which can be contradictory to or incompatible with each other. As a consequen * A lifestyle, and sometimes fashionable statement to go along with the marketing of all things free and open; * An economic model that tries to reconcile the legacy of radical anti-property art practice with the reformist nature of social critique; * An aesthetic in the sense of an audiovisual language, like meme culture, but also a number of novelty appropriative frameworks ranging from semionauts to circulationism. +
Aymeric Mansoux, Sandbox Culture (2017) - p.377 diff --git a/free-culture-confusions-and-misunderstanding.md.html b/free-culture-confusions-and-misunderstanding.md.html index fa7c4ab..79b18e4 100644 --- a/free-culture-confusions-and-misunderstanding.md.html +++ b/free-culture-confusions-and-misunderstanding.md.html @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@

Free culture

+

There is so much confusion and misunderstanding about all these elements because they manifest and materialise differently at several levels, via a process of rationalisation that leads to the fragmentation of cultural freedom into new codes of meaning, the ideological and emotional nature of which can be contradictory to or incompatible with each other. As a consequence, free culture ends up being simply many different things at once:

  • A toolkit for artists to expand their practice and free themselves from consumerist workflows;
    • @@ -23,6 +24,7 @@
  • An economic model that tries to reconcile the legacy of radical anti-property art practice with the reformist nature of social critique;
  • An aesthetic in the sense of an audiovisual language, like meme culture, but also a number of novelty appropriative frameworks ranging from semionauts to circulationism.
+

Aymeric Mansoux, Sandbox Culture (2017) - p.377

diff --git a/index.css b/index.css index e0ecab0..da43973 100644 --- a/index.css +++ b/index.css @@ -1,11 +1,15 @@ body{ #background-color: pink; + margin-top:calc(6px + 1em); } body > a { position: fixed; - top: 10px; - left: 31px; - color:magenta; + top: 0; + left: 0; + color: white; + background-color: fuchsia; + width: 100%; + padding: 3px 10px; } div{ max-width: 520px; @@ -39,3 +43,8 @@ figcaption, a{ word-break: break-word; } +blockquote{ + margin:3em 0; + padding:0; + font-style:italic; +} diff --git a/index.html b/index.html index c173c62..9a39724 100644 --- a/index.html +++ b/index.html @@ -15,12 +15,16 @@ video {width:640px;max-height:640px;} body{ #background-color: pink; + margin-top:calc(6px + 1em); } body > a { position: fixed; - top: 10px; - left: 31px; - color:magenta; + top: 0; + left: 0; + color: white; + background-color: fuchsia; + width: 100%; + padding: 3px 10px; } div{ max-width: 520px; @@ -54,10 +58,17 @@ figcaption, a{ word-break: break-word; } +blockquote{ + margin:3em 0; + padding:0; + font-style:italic; +} + + @@ -81,6 +92,7 @@ a{

Free culture

+

There is so much confusion and misunderstanding about all these elements because they manifest and materialise differently at several levels, via a process of rationalisation that leads to the fragmentation of cultural freedom into new codes of meaning, the ideological and emotional nature of which can be contradictory to or incompatible with each other. As a consequence, free culture ends up being simply many different things at once:

  • A toolkit for artists to expand their practice and free themselves from consumerist workflows;
    • @@ -90,6 +102,7 @@ a{
  • An economic model that tries to reconcile the legacy of radical anti-property art practice with the reformist nature of social critique;
  • An aesthetic in the sense of an audiovisual language, like meme culture, but also a number of novelty appropriative frameworks ranging from semionauts to circulationism.
+

Aymeric Mansoux, Sandbox Culture (2017) - p.377

diff --git a/license-readings/GPL.md b/license-readings/GPL.md index d1212cb..2360525 100644 --- a/license-readings/GPL.md +++ b/license-readings/GPL.md @@ -2,16 +2,7 @@ -* "A license for software and other kinds of works." -* "**Developers** that use the GNU GPL protect your rights with two steps: (1) assert copyright on the software, and (2) offer you this License giving you legal permission to copy, distribute and/or modify it." -* “The **Program**” refers to any copyrightable work licensed under this License. Each licensee is addressed as “you”. “Licensees” and “recipients” may be individuals or organizations." -* "The “**source code**” for a work means the preferred form of the work for making modifications to it. “Object code” means any non-source form of a work." -* "This License explicitly affirms your unlimited permission to run the unmodified Program." -* "Conveying Non-Source Forms" = hardware. -* "Termination" — gives very specific information on days and procedure. -* An “entity transaction” is a transaction transferring control of an organization, or substantially all assets of one, or subdividing an organization, or merging organizations. If propagation of a covered work results from an entity transaction, each party to that transaction who receives a copy of the work also receives whatever licenses to the work the party's predecessor in interest had or could give under the previous paragraph, plus a right to possession of the Corresponding Source of the work from the predecessor in interest, if the predecessor has it or can get it with reasonable efforts. -* Each contributor grants you a non-exclusive, **worldwide**, royalty-free patent license under the contributor's essential patent claims, to make, use, sell, offer for sale, import and otherwise run, modify and propagate the contents of its contributor version. -* A patent license is “**discriminatory**” if it does not include within the scope of its coverage, prohibits the exercise of, or is conditioned on the non-exercise of one or more of the rights that are specifically granted under this License. — (License vs Patent: A patent is a legal right to exclude others from doing (making, using, selling) etc. what the patent covers. The legal right is owned by the patent owner (with some exceptions). On the other hand, a license is a legal right to not be excluded from doing what the patent covers. The license is granted by the patent owner to the licensee (with some exceptions), usually in exchange for something that benefits the patent owner.) - - - +* “Licensees” and “recipients” may be **individuals** or **organizations**. +* "The “**source code**” for a work means the preferred form of the work for making modifications to it. +* "**Termination**" — gives very specific information on days and procedure. +* **non-exclusive**, **worldwide** diff --git a/license-readings/GPL.md.html b/license-readings/GPL.md.html index fb972c6..0f6da86 100644 --- a/license-readings/GPL.md.html +++ b/license-readings/GPL.md.html @@ -16,16 +16,10 @@

GNU General Public License (GPL)

https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.html

    -
  • “A license for software and other kinds of works.”
    • -
  • “Developers that use the GNU GPL protect your rights with two steps: (1) assert copyright on the software, and (2) offer you this License giving you legal permission to copy, distribute and/or modify it.”
    • -
  • “The Program” refers to any copyrightable work licensed under this License. Each licensee is addressed as “you”. “Licensees” and “recipients” may be individuals or organizations."
    • -
  • “The “source code” for a work means the preferred form of the work for making modifications to it. “Object code” means any non-source form of a work."
    • -
  • “This License explicitly affirms your unlimited permission to run the unmodified Program.”
    • -
  • “Conveying Non-Source Forms” = hardware.
    • -
  • “Termination” — gives very specific information on days and procedure.
    • -
  • An “entity transaction” is a transaction transferring control of an organization, or substantially all assets of one, or subdividing an organization, or merging organizations. If propagation of a covered work results from an entity transaction, each party to that transaction who receives a copy of the work also receives whatever licenses to the work the party’s predecessor in interest had or could give under the previous paragraph, plus a right to possession of the Corresponding Source of the work from the predecessor in interest, if the predecessor has it or can get it with reasonable efforts.
    • -
  • Each contributor grants you a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free patent license under the contributor’s essential patent claims, to make, use, sell, offer for sale, import and otherwise run, modify and propagate the contents of its contributor version.
    • -
  • A patent license is “discriminatory” if it does not include within the scope of its coverage, prohibits the exercise of, or is conditioned on the non-exercise of one or more of the rights that are specifically granted under this License. — (License vs Patent: A patent is a legal right to exclude others from doing (making, using, selling) etc. what the patent covers. The legal right is owned by the patent owner (with some exceptions). On the other hand, a license is a legal right to not be excluded from doing what the patent covers. The license is granted by the patent owner to the licensee (with some exceptions), usually in exchange for something that benefits the patent owner.)
    • +
  • “Licensees” and “recipients” may be individuals or organizations.
    • +
  • “The “source code” for a work means the preferred form of the work for making modifications to it.
    • +
  • “Termination” — gives very specific information on days and procedure.
    • +
  • non-exclusive, worldwide
diff --git a/license-readings/README.md b/license-readings/README.md index 2862959..89f677d 100644 --- a/license-readings/README.md +++ b/license-readings/README.md @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# README -These snippets are notes that we took while reading a whole range of open licenses. +These snippets are notes that we took while reading a selection of open licenses.
diff --git a/license-readings/README.md.html b/license-readings/README.md.html index 403ae1a..b6be794 100644 --- a/license-readings/README.md.html +++ b/license-readings/README.md.html @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@

README

-

These snippets are notes that we took while reading a whole range of open licenses.

+

These snippets are notes that we took while reading a selection of open licenses.

diff --git a/license-readings/index.html b/license-readings/index.html index 6b523c9..e0fa29f 100644 --- a/license-readings/index.html +++ b/license-readings/index.html @@ -15,12 +15,16 @@ video {width:640px;max-height:640px;} body{ #background-color: pink; + margin-top:calc(6px + 1em); } body > a { position: fixed; - top: 10px; - left: 31px; - color:magenta; + top: 0; + left: 0; + color: white; + background-color: fuchsia; + width: 100%; + padding: 3px 10px; } div{ max-width: 520px; @@ -54,6 +58,11 @@ figcaption, a{ word-break: break-word; } +blockquote{ + margin:3em 0; + padding:0; + font-style:italic; +} @@ -77,16 +86,10 @@ a{

GNU General Public License (GPL)

https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.html

    -
  • “A license for software and other kinds of works.”
    • -
  • “Developers that use the GNU GPL protect your rights with two steps: (1) assert copyright on the software, and (2) offer you this License giving you legal permission to copy, distribute and/or modify it.”
    • -
  • “The Program” refers to any copyrightable work licensed under this License. Each licensee is addressed as “you”. “Licensees” and “recipients” may be individuals or organizations."
    • -
  • “The “source code” for a work means the preferred form of the work for making modifications to it. “Object code” means any non-source form of a work."
    • -
  • “This License explicitly affirms your unlimited permission to run the unmodified Program.”
    • -
  • “Conveying Non-Source Forms” = hardware.
    • -
  • “Termination” — gives very specific information on days and procedure.
    • -
  • An “entity transaction” is a transaction transferring control of an organization, or substantially all assets of one, or subdividing an organization, or merging organizations. If propagation of a covered work results from an entity transaction, each party to that transaction who receives a copy of the work also receives whatever licenses to the work the party’s predecessor in interest had or could give under the previous paragraph, plus a right to possession of the Corresponding Source of the work from the predecessor in interest, if the predecessor has it or can get it with reasonable efforts.
    • -
  • Each contributor grants you a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free patent license under the contributor’s essential patent claims, to make, use, sell, offer for sale, import and otherwise run, modify and propagate the contents of its contributor version.
    • -
  • A patent license is “discriminatory” if it does not include within the scope of its coverage, prohibits the exercise of, or is conditioned on the non-exercise of one or more of the rights that are specifically granted under this License. — (License vs Patent: A patent is a legal right to exclude others from doing (making, using, selling) etc. what the patent covers. The legal right is owned by the patent owner (with some exceptions). On the other hand, a license is a legal right to not be excluded from doing what the patent covers. The license is granted by the patent owner to the licensee (with some exceptions), usually in exchange for something that benefits the patent owner.)
    • +
  • “Licensees” and “recipients” may be individuals or organizations.
    • +
  • “The “source code” for a work means the preferred form of the work for making modifications to it.
    • +
  • “Termination” — gives very specific information on days and procedure.
    • +
  • non-exclusive, worldwide
@@ -110,7 +113,7 @@ a{

README

-

These snippets are notes that we took while reading a whole range of open licenses.

+

These snippets are notes that we took while reading a selection of open licenses.

diff --git a/more-recent/U2764-journal-license-statement-kibi-gô.png b/more-recent/U2764-journal-license-statement-kibi-gô.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000..825a043 Binary files /dev/null and b/more-recent/U2764-journal-license-statement-kibi-gô.png differ diff --git a/more-recent/go.kibi.family-my-code-is-likely-not-useful-for-you.png b/more-recent/go.kibi.family-my-code-is-likely-not-useful-for-you.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000..32e90ab Binary files /dev/null and b/more-recent/go.kibi.family-my-code-is-likely-not-useful-for-you.png differ diff --git a/more-recent/index.html b/more-recent/index.html index 20da36b..41b276e 100644 --- a/more-recent/index.html +++ b/more-recent/index.html @@ -15,12 +15,16 @@ video {width:640px;max-height:640px;} body{ #background-color: pink; + margin-top:calc(6px + 1em); } body > a { position: fixed; - top: 10px; - left: 31px; - color:magenta; + top: 0; + left: 0; + color: white; + background-color: fuchsia; + width: 100%; + padding: 3px 10px; } div{ max-width: 520px; @@ -54,12 +58,44 @@ figcaption, a{ word-break: break-word; } +blockquote{ + margin:3em 0; + padding:0; + font-style:italic; +} +
U2764-journal-license-statement-kibi-gô.png
+
go.kibi.family-my-code-is-likely-not-useful-for-you.png
intersections-of-care-rhizomatic-open-source.png
+
+ + + + + + sources + + + +

Sources

+

Intersections of Care (2019) http://www.intersectionsofcare.net/

+

Kibi Gô (2020) https://go.kibi.family/

+

Various Web Page Designs, Kibi Gô (2020) https://style.u2764.com/

+

2764 journal, Kibi Gô (2020) https://www.u2764.com/

+ + +
+
various-webpage-styles-kibi-gô-1.png
+
various-webpage-styles-kibi-gô-2.png
../ diff --git a/more-recent/sources.md b/more-recent/sources.md index 85000db..1592ec9 100644 --- a/more-recent/sources.md +++ b/more-recent/sources.md @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ # Sources Intersections of Care (2019) + +Kibi Gô (2020) + +Various Web Page Designs, Kibi Gô (2020) + +\U2764 journal, Kibi Gô (2020) diff --git a/more-recent/sources.md.html b/more-recent/sources.md.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..aa40a7d --- /dev/null +++ b/more-recent/sources.md.html @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ + + + + + + + sources + + + +

Sources

+

Intersections of Care (2019) http://www.intersectionsofcare.net/

+

Kibi Gô (2020) https://go.kibi.family/

+

Various Web Page Designs, Kibi Gô (2020) https://style.u2764.com/

+

2764 journal, Kibi Gô (2020) https://www.u2764.com/

+ + diff --git a/more-recent/various-webpage-styles-kibi-gô-1.png b/more-recent/various-webpage-styles-kibi-gô-1.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000..5e1d733 Binary files /dev/null and b/more-recent/various-webpage-styles-kibi-gô-1.png differ diff --git a/more-recent/various-webpage-styles-kibi-gô-2.png b/more-recent/various-webpage-styles-kibi-gô-2.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000..908c6a1 Binary files /dev/null and b/more-recent/various-webpage-styles-kibi-gô-2.png differ diff --git a/proto-copyleft/.md b/proto-copyleft/.md index 0a1e6ee..649a784 100644 --- a/proto-copyleft/.md +++ b/proto-copyleft/.md @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@ -I [Aymeric Mansoux] found it mentionned with the mark *“\”* instead of *“(L)”* in the lyrics of a filk song 17 inspired +
+I found it mentionned with the mark *“\”* instead of *“(L)”* in the lyrics of a filk song 17 inspired by the Dune science fiction saga by American author Frank Herbert. The lyrics were signed *“\ 1992 by Jeremy Buhler”* with a note at the end of the file *“PS - \ means copyleft”*. +
Aymeric Mansoux, Sandbox Culture (2017) diff --git a/proto-copyleft/.md.html b/proto-copyleft/.md.html index a32a4e4..b76c3e4 100644 --- a/proto-copyleft/.md.html +++ b/proto-copyleft/.md.html @@ -13,7 +13,9 @@ -

I [Aymeric Mansoux] found it mentionned with the mark “<L>” instead of “(L)” in the lyrics of a filk song 17 inspired by the Dune science fiction saga by American author Frank Herbert. The lyrics were signed “<L> 1992 by Jeremy Buhler” with a note at the end of the file “PS - <L> means copyleft”.

+
+I found it mentionned with the mark “<L>” instead of “(L)” in the lyrics of a filk song 17 inspired by the Dune science fiction saga by American author Frank Herbert. The lyrics were signed “<L> 1992 by Jeremy Buhler” with a note at the end of the file “PS - <L> means copyleft”. +

Aymeric Mansoux, Sandbox Culture (2017)

diff --git a/proto-copyleft/COPY-IT-RIGHT.md b/proto-copyleft/COPY-IT-RIGHT.md index a213fdb..859af7e 100644 --- a/proto-copyleft/COPY-IT-RIGHT.md +++ b/proto-copyleft/COPY-IT-RIGHT.md @@ -1,4 +1,6 @@ +
Morton developed an approach he called COPY-IT-RIGHT, an anti-copyright approach to making and freely sharing Media art. The Distribution Religion and Morton's individual and collaborative Media art works were released under his COPY-IT-RIGHT license. COPY-IT-RIGHT encouraged people to make faithful copies, caring for and distributing the work as widely as possible. +
diff --git a/proto-copyleft/COPY-IT-RIGHT.md.html b/proto-copyleft/COPY-IT-RIGHT.md.html index f2eead6..effad33 100644 --- a/proto-copyleft/COPY-IT-RIGHT.md.html +++ b/proto-copyleft/COPY-IT-RIGHT.md.html @@ -13,7 +13,9 @@ -

Morton developed an approach he called COPY-IT-RIGHT, an anti-copyright approach to making and freely sharing Media art. The Distribution Religion and Morton’s individual and collaborative Media art works were released under his COPY-IT-RIGHT license. COPY-IT-RIGHT encouraged people to make faithful copies, caring for and distributing the work as widely as possible.

+
+Morton developed an approach he called COPY-IT-RIGHT, an anti-copyright approach to making and freely sharing Media art. The Distribution Religion and Morton’s individual and collaborative Media art works were released under his COPY-IT-RIGHT license. COPY-IT-RIGHT encouraged people to make faithful copies, caring for and distributing the work as widely as possible. +

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phil_Morton

diff --git a/proto-copyleft/Copyleft-sticker.md b/proto-copyleft/Copyleft-sticker.md index ead1078..c99b06d 100644 --- a/proto-copyleft/Copyleft-sticker.md +++ b/proto-copyleft/Copyleft-sticker.md @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ +
(...) \[O\]ne day in 1984 Stallman received by mail a programming manual that had been borrowed by American hacker and computer artist Don Hopkins. On the envelope @@ -16,5 +17,6 @@ inspire Stallman to use the word copyleft to describe the properties of the GPL. 16 This is how copyleft, the symbol of rebellious cultural practices, ended up being claimed as a term to describe a particular mechanism of free software licensing. +
Aymeric Mansoux, Sandbox Culture (2017) - p. 211-212 diff --git a/proto-copyleft/Copyleft-sticker.md.html b/proto-copyleft/Copyleft-sticker.md.html index ef64cf8..3696f82 100644 --- a/proto-copyleft/Copyleft-sticker.md.html +++ b/proto-copyleft/Copyleft-sticker.md.html @@ -13,7 +13,9 @@ -

(…) [O]ne day in 1984 Stallman received by mail a programming manual that had been borrowed by American hacker and computer artist Don Hopkins. On the envelope a stickers reading “Copyleft (L)” was used to seal the small package. Hopkins had bought a pack of stickers at a science fiction convention, where hackers, including Stallman, often gathered and where it was common for them to organise and share rooms, notably for “@” parties in which people with email addresses could meet each other. 14 According to Hopkins, at that time the term copyleft was not part of the hacker culture, and the stickers had been purchased in the dealer’s room of one convention with other comics, political, and satirical stickers and buttons. 15 Knowing Stallman’s appreciation for such things, Hopkins had decorated the letter in a similar spirit. Little did he know that eventually the sticker and the pseudo-copyright statement he had written as a joke (Figure 5.2), would inspire Stallman to use the word copyleft to describe the properties of the GPL. 16 This is how copyleft, the symbol of rebellious cultural practices, ended up being claimed as a term to describe a particular mechanism of free software licensing.

+
+(…) [O]ne day in 1984 Stallman received by mail a programming manual that had been borrowed by American hacker and computer artist Don Hopkins. On the envelope a stickers reading “Copyleft (L)” was used to seal the small package. Hopkins had bought a pack of stickers at a science fiction convention, where hackers, including Stallman, often gathered and where it was common for them to organise and share rooms, notably for “@” parties in which people with email addresses could meet each other. 14 According to Hopkins, at that time the term copyleft was not part of the hacker culture, and the stickers had been purchased in the dealer’s room of one convention with other comics, political, and satirical stickers and buttons. 15 Knowing Stallman’s appreciation for such things, Hopkins had decorated the letter in a similar spirit. Little did he know that eventually the sticker and the pseudo-copyright statement he had written as a joke (Figure 5.2), would inspire Stallman to use the word copyleft to describe the properties of the GPL. 16 This is how copyleft, the symbol of rebellious cultural practices, ended up being claimed as a term to describe a particular mechanism of free software licensing. +

Aymeric Mansoux, Sandbox Culture (2017) - p. 211-212

diff --git a/proto-copyleft/README.md b/proto-copyleft/about-this-folder.md similarity index 95% rename from proto-copyleft/README.md rename to proto-copyleft/about-this-folder.md index 9da575f..a2c2b97 100644 --- a/proto-copyleft/README.md +++ b/proto-copyleft/about-this-folder.md @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-# README +# about this folder This page includes examples of different people that were exploring attitudes/gestures/(social)-movements towards copyright, before the term "copyleft" was introduced as a legal tool. The techno-legal "hack" of copyleft was introduced by Richard Stallman in 1984. But it's interesting to see how these examples are all created before that, and were already exploring attitudes of being critical towards copyright laws.
diff --git a/proto-copyleft/README.md.html b/proto-copyleft/about-this-folder.md.html similarity index 92% rename from proto-copyleft/README.md.html rename to proto-copyleft/about-this-folder.md.html index 6c185c9..9412a50 100644 --- a/proto-copyleft/README.md.html +++ b/proto-copyleft/about-this-folder.md.html @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ - README + about-this-folder @@ -77,7 +86,9 @@ a{ -

I [Aymeric Mansoux] found it mentionned with the mark “<L>” instead of “(L)” in the lyrics of a filk song 17 inspired by the Dune science fiction saga by American author Frank Herbert. The lyrics were signed “<L> 1992 by Jeremy Buhler” with a note at the end of the file “PS - <L> means copyleft”.

+
+I found it mentionned with the mark “<L>” instead of “(L)” in the lyrics of a filk song 17 inspired by the Dune science fiction saga by American author Frank Herbert. The lyrics were signed “<L> 1992 by Jeremy Buhler” with a note at the end of the file “PS - <L> means copyleft”. +

Aymeric Mansoux, Sandbox Culture (2017)

@@ -104,7 +115,9 @@ a{ -

Morton developed an approach he called COPY-IT-RIGHT, an anti-copyright approach to making and freely sharing Media art. The Distribution Religion and Morton’s individual and collaborative Media art works were released under his COPY-IT-RIGHT license. COPY-IT-RIGHT encouraged people to make faithful copies, caring for and distributing the work as widely as possible.

+
+Morton developed an approach he called COPY-IT-RIGHT, an anti-copyright approach to making and freely sharing Media art. The Distribution Religion and Morton’s individual and collaborative Media art works were released under his COPY-IT-RIGHT license. COPY-IT-RIGHT encouraged people to make faithful copies, caring for and distributing the work as widely as possible. +

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phil_Morton

@@ -128,7 +141,9 @@ a{ -

(…) [O]ne day in 1984 Stallman received by mail a programming manual that had been borrowed by American hacker and computer artist Don Hopkins. On the envelope a stickers reading “Copyleft (L)” was used to seal the small package. Hopkins had bought a pack of stickers at a science fiction convention, where hackers, including Stallman, often gathered and where it was common for them to organise and share rooms, notably for “@” parties in which people with email addresses could meet each other. 14 According to Hopkins, at that time the term copyleft was not part of the hacker culture, and the stickers had been purchased in the dealer’s room of one convention with other comics, political, and satirical stickers and buttons. 15 Knowing Stallman’s appreciation for such things, Hopkins had decorated the letter in a similar spirit. Little did he know that eventually the sticker and the pseudo-copyright statement he had written as a joke (Figure 5.2), would inspire Stallman to use the word copyleft to describe the properties of the GPL. 16 This is how copyleft, the symbol of rebellious cultural practices, ended up being claimed as a term to describe a particular mechanism of free software licensing.

+
+(…) [O]ne day in 1984 Stallman received by mail a programming manual that had been borrowed by American hacker and computer artist Don Hopkins. On the envelope a stickers reading “Copyleft (L)” was used to seal the small package. Hopkins had bought a pack of stickers at a science fiction convention, where hackers, including Stallman, often gathered and where it was common for them to organise and share rooms, notably for “@” parties in which people with email addresses could meet each other. 14 According to Hopkins, at that time the term copyleft was not part of the hacker culture, and the stickers had been purchased in the dealer’s room of one convention with other comics, political, and satirical stickers and buttons. 15 Knowing Stallman’s appreciation for such things, Hopkins had decorated the letter in a similar spirit. Little did he know that eventually the sticker and the pseudo-copyright statement he had written as a joke (Figure 5.2), would inspire Stallman to use the word copyleft to describe the properties of the GPL. 16 This is how copyleft, the symbol of rebellious cultural practices, ended up being claimed as a term to describe a particular mechanism of free software licensing. +

Aymeric Mansoux, Sandbox Culture (2017) - p. 211-212

@@ -139,14 +154,18 @@ a{
FLUXUS-Letter-to-Tomas-Schmit-1964.png
FLUXUS-Letter-to-Tomas-Schmitt-1964_Flux-objectives-are-social-(not-aesthetic).pdf
Principia-Discordia-1979.png
- -
+
Situationist-International-publication-statement-1959.png
+
Tiny-BASIC-1976.png
+
a-Xerox-Mark-Radical-Software-1973.png
+
a-Xerox-Mark-Radical-Software-VOLUME1NR3_colophon-1973.pdf
+ +
- README + about-this-folder diff --git a/proto-copyleft/svg/index.html b/proto-copyleft/svg/index.html index c629086..7a625b1 100644 --- a/proto-copyleft/svg/index.html +++ b/proto-copyleft/svg/index.html @@ -15,12 +15,16 @@ video {width:640px;max-height:640px;} body{ #background-color: pink; + margin-top:calc(6px + 1em); } body > a { position: fixed; - top: 10px; - left: 31px; - color:magenta; + top: 0; + left: 0; + color: white; + background-color: fuchsia; + width: 100%; + padding: 3px 10px; } div{ max-width: 520px; @@ -54,6 +58,11 @@ figcaption, a{ word-break: break-word; } +blockquote{ + margin:3em 0; + padding:0; + font-style:italic; +} diff --git a/publishing_acts/index.html b/publishing_acts/index.html index b86c7dd..a58ed4f 100644 --- a/publishing_acts/index.html +++ b/publishing_acts/index.html @@ -15,12 +15,16 @@ video {width:640px;max-height:640px;} body{ #background-color: pink; + margin-top:calc(6px + 1em); } body > a { position: fixed; - top: 10px; - left: 31px; - color:magenta; + top: 0; + left: 0; + color: white; + background-color: fuchsia; + width: 100%; + padding: 3px 10px; } div{ max-width: 520px; @@ -54,6 +58,11 @@ figcaption, a{ word-break: break-word; } +blockquote{ + margin:3em 0; + padding:0; + font-style:italic; +} diff --git a/techno-feminism/about-this-folder.md b/techno-feminism/about-this-folder.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..bf5020e --- /dev/null +++ b/techno-feminism/about-this-folder.md @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +
+# about this folder + +Snippets of technofeminist writings, in which statements are made that speak about authorship, property, open access, sharing and other open-license related subjects. + + + + + +
diff --git a/techno-feminism/about-this-folder.md.html b/techno-feminism/about-this-folder.md.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ebb79cb --- /dev/null +++ b/techno-feminism/about-this-folder.md.html @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ + + + + + + + about-this-folder + + + +
+

about this folder

+

Snippets of technofeminist writings, in which statements are made that speak about authorship, property, open access, sharing and other open-license related subjects.

+
+ + diff --git a/techno-feminism/index.html b/techno-feminism/index.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..23b52ef --- /dev/null +++ b/techno-feminism/index.html @@ -0,0 +1,120 @@ + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + about-this-folder + + + +
+

about this folder

+

Snippets of technofeminist writings, in which statements are made that speak about authorship, property, open access, sharing and other open-license related subjects.

+
+ + +
+
riot-grrrl-manifesto-snippet-4.png
+ +
+ + + + + + sources + + + + + + +
+../ + + + diff --git a/techno-feminism/riot-grrrl-manifesto-snippet-4.png b/techno-feminism/riot-grrrl-manifesto-snippet-4.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000..00897bb Binary files /dev/null and b/techno-feminism/riot-grrrl-manifesto-snippet-4.png differ diff --git a/techno-feminism/sources.md b/techno-feminism/sources.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b410638 --- /dev/null +++ b/techno-feminism/sources.md @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +
+# Sources + +Riot Grrrls Manifesto (1989) + +
diff --git a/techno-feminism/sources.md.html b/techno-feminism/sources.md.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a8732d2 --- /dev/null +++ b/techno-feminism/sources.md.html @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ + + + + + + + sources + + + + + +