forked from varia/post-script
You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
122 lines
9.9 KiB
122 lines
9.9 KiB
<!doctype html>
|
|
|
|
<html lang="$language$">
|
|
|
|
<head>
|
|
<meta charset="utf-8">
|
|
<link href="css/post-script.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="print">
|
|
<title>$title$</title>
|
|
</head>
|
|
|
|
<body>
|
|
|
|
<section id="cover">
|
|
|
|
<h1 class="title">$title$</h1>
|
|
<pre id="cover-pattern">
|
|
Ranciere's the ignorant master ?
|
|
I just said "testing, testing, testing"
|
|
— did you hear it ?
|
|
And so, if this is a limited case use, just for
|
|
missing children, "how do we know that it's working ?
|
|
Is privacy sandbox an effort to turn the web into its own Facebook ?
|
|
Eliminate behavioral tracking completely and shift to another economic mode ?
|
|
Do we want more control over devices? If we do, who should control them ?
|
|
This is about those few rowdy elements or suspicious
|
|
people who we want to catch, and so, the form of resistance of
|
|
the form of obfuscation if you will, is to say, "how do you know that it works" ?
|
|
You really had to look for evidence of these kinds of
|
|
technologies' use, so the only kind of resistance we had was, "is this accurate?", and "does it work" ?
|
|
If it's a repressive government that then can siphon
|
|
information off, is it the appropriate level of governance for this and how do you ensure… ?
|
|
And when it became a sorting tool, the question or the form of resistance
|
|
became, "how are you doing this? Under what authority of law are you doing this?", right ?
|
|
What if, instead of trying to fly under the enemy’s radar,
|
|
we let that radar help us find allies with whom we can fly in formation ?
|
|
The ad side has extensive ad fraud such as fraudulent clicks.
|
|
What do you now know, what is real and what isn't real, in terms of what we can measure ?
|
|
How does that impact whether the whole complicated
|
|
exercise is even something worthwhile for us to
|
|
resist or engage with, or do we really need to overturn the whole thing ?
|
|
Tools like AdNauseam are still primarily focussed on an individual.
|
|
Sally, is it perhaps that we cannot take such an individual approach ?
|
|
We thought that without these technologies
|
|
we did a really good job, is the necessity of this really proportionate to our legal rights ?
|
|
Can you comment on the ethics of intentional/unintentional negative impact
|
|
of obfuscation / subversive AI on the *non-users* of obfuscation / subversive AI ?
|
|
Talking about how we can flip the script to talking about the fact
|
|
that these technologies are not inevitable, getting into the resistance,
|
|
getting into the advocacy game before the use become ubiquitous is a big challenge now, right ?
|
|
So how can we know for sure whether AdNauseam clicks work or not ?
|
|
Are the clicks that we successfully introduced experimental
|
|
click fraud, or can the clicks that we introduced be considered as fraud ?
|
|
With that in mind,
|
|
is browser-based obfuscation something that is still possible and meaningful ?
|
|
So now, from the side of publishers, it's an interesting question
|
|
as to whether the publishers would be interested in obfuscation
|
|
and what degree of obfuscation, and who would be obfuscated to who ?
|
|
So how well does this work ?
|
|
</pre>
|
|
|
|
</section>
|
|
<section id="cursorpage1"></section>
|
|
$if(toc)$
|
|
<section id="TOC" role="doc-toc">
|
|
$if(toc-title)$
|
|
<h2 id="$idprefix$toc-title">$toc-title$</h2>
|
|
$endif$
|
|
$table-of-contents$
|
|
</section>
|
|
$endif$
|
|
$body$
|
|
|
|
<section id="cursorpage2"></section>
|
|
<section id="backcover">
|
|
<pre id="backcover-pattern">
|
|
Ranciere's the ignorant master ?
|
|
I just said "testing, testing, testing"
|
|
— did you hear it ?
|
|
And so, if this is a limited case use, just for
|
|
missing children, "how do we know that it's working ?
|
|
Is privacy sandbox an effort to turn the web into its own Facebook ?
|
|
Eliminate behavioral tracking completely and shift to another economic mode ?
|
|
Do we want more control over devices? If we do, who should control them ?
|
|
This is about those few rowdy elements or suspicious
|
|
people who we want to catch, and so, the form of resistance of
|
|
the form of obfuscation if you will, is to say, "how do you know that it works" ?
|
|
You really had to look for evidence of these kinds of
|
|
technologies' use, so the only kind of resistance we had was, "is this accurate?", and "does it work" ?
|
|
If it's a repressive government that then can siphon
|
|
information off, is it the appropriate level of governance for this and how do you ensure… ?
|
|
And when it became a sorting tool, the question or the form of resistance
|
|
became, "how are you doing this? Under what authority of law are you doing this?", right ?
|
|
What if, instead of trying to fly under the enemy’s radar,
|
|
we let that radar help us find allies with whom we can fly in formation ?
|
|
The ad side has extensive ad fraud such as fraudulent clicks.
|
|
What do you now know, what is real and what isn't real, in terms of what we can measure ?
|
|
How does that impact whether the whole complicated
|
|
exercise is even something worthwhile for us to
|
|
resist or engage with, or do we really need to overturn the whole thing ?
|
|
Tools like AdNauseam are still primarily focussed on an individual.
|
|
Sally, is it perhaps that we cannot take such an individual approach ?
|
|
We thought that without these technologies
|
|
we did a really good job, is the necessity of this really proportionate to our legal rights ?
|
|
Can you comment on the ethics of intentional/unintentional negative impact
|
|
of obfuscation / subversive AI on the *non-users* of obfuscation / subversive AI ?
|
|
Talking about how we can flip the script to talking about the fact
|
|
that these technologies are not inevitable, getting into the resistance,
|
|
getting into the advocacy game before the use become ubiquitous is a big challenge now, right ?
|
|
So how can we know for sure whether AdNauseam clicks work or not ?
|
|
Are the clicks that we successfully introduced experimental
|
|
click fraud, or can the clicks that we introduced be considered as fraud ?
|
|
With that in mind,
|
|
is browser-based obfuscation something that is still possible and meaningful ?
|
|
So now, from the side of publishers, it's an interesting question
|
|
as to whether the publishers would be interested in obfuscation
|
|
and what degree of obfuscation, and who would be obfuscated to who ?
|
|
So how well does this work ?
|
|
</pre>
|
|
</section>
|
|
</body>
|
|
|
|
</html>
|
|
|