You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
96 lines
8.6 KiB
96 lines
8.6 KiB
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" standalone="no"?>
|
|
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>Choosing an Editor</title><link rel="stylesheet" href="taoup.css" type="text/css"/><meta name="generator" content="DocBook XSL Stylesheets V1.58.1"/><link rel="home" href="index.html" title="The Art of Unix Programming"/><link rel="up" href="toolschapter.html" title="Chapter 15. Tools"/><link rel="previous" href="ch15s01.html" title="A Developer-Friendly Operating System"/><link rel="next" href="ch15s03.html" title="Special-Purpose Code Generators"/></head><body><div class="navheader"><table width="100%" summary="Navigation header"><tr><th colspan="3" align="center">Choosing an Editor</th></tr><tr><td width="20%" align="left"><a accesskey="p" href="ch15s01.html">Prev</a> </td><th width="60%" align="center">Chapter 15. Tools</th><td width="20%" align="right"> <a accesskey="n" href="ch15s03.html">Next</a></td></tr></table><hr/></div><div class="sect1" lang="en"><div class="titlepage"><div><h2 class="title" style="clear: both"><a id="id2980633"/>Choosing an Editor</h2></div></div><p>The first and most basic tool of development is a text editor
|
|
suitable for modifying and writing programs.</p><p>Literally dozens of text editors are available under Unix;
|
|
writing one seems to be one of the standard finger exercises for
|
|
budding open-source
|
|
hackers<a id="id2980650" class="indexterm"/>. Most of
|
|
these are ephemera, not suitable for extended use by anyone other than
|
|
their authors. A few are emulations of non-Unix editors, useful as
|
|
transition aids for programmers used to other operating systems. You
|
|
can browse through a wide variety at SourceForge or ibiblio or any
|
|
other major open-source archive.</p><p>For serious editing work, two editors completely dominate the
|
|
Unix programming scene. Each is available in a couple of minor variant
|
|
implementations, but has a standard version you can rely on finding on
|
|
any modern Unix system. These two editors are
|
|
<i>vi</i> and <i>Emacs</i>.
|
|
We discussed them in <a href="complexitychapter.html" title="Chapter 13. Complexity">Chapter 13</a> as part of our discussion of the right
|
|
size of software.</p><p>As we noted in <a href="complexitychapter.html" title="Chapter 13. Complexity">Chapter 13</a>, these two editors express sharply
|
|
contrasting design philosophies, but both are extremely popular and
|
|
command great loyalty from identifiable core user populations. Surveys
|
|
of Unix programmers consistently indicate about a 50/50 split between
|
|
them, with all other editors barely registering.</p><p>In our earlier examinations of <i>vi</i> and
|
|
<i>Emacs</i>, we were primarily concerned with
|
|
their optional complexity and the surrounding design-philosophy issues.
|
|
Many other things are worth knowing about these editors, both as a
|
|
matter of practicality and of Unix cultural literacy.</p><div class="sect2" lang="en"><div class="titlepage"><div><h3 class="title"><a id="vi_literacy"/>Useful Things to Know about <i>vi</i></h3></div></div><a id="id2979331" class="indexterm"/><p>The name of <i>vi</i> is an abbreviation for
|
|
“visual editor” and is pronounced <span class="phonetic">/vee eye/</span> (not <span class="phonetic">/vie/</span> and <span class="emphasis"><em>definitely</em></span>
|
|
not <span class="phonetic">/siks/</span>!).</p><p><i>vi</i> was not quite the earliest
|
|
screen-oriented editor; that palm goes to the Rand editor,
|
|
<span class="emphasis"><em>re</em></span>, that ran on Version 6 Unix in the 1970s. But
|
|
<i>vi</i> is the longest-lived screen-oriented
|
|
editor built for Unix that is still in use, and is a hallowed part of
|
|
Unix tradition.</p><p>The original <i>vi</i> was the version
|
|
present in the earliest BSD software distributions<a id="id2979416" class="indexterm"/> beginning in 1976; it is now obsolete. Its
|
|
replacement was ‘new vi’ which shipped with 4.4BSD and is
|
|
found on modern 4.4BSD variants such as BSD/OS, FreeBSD, and NetBSD
|
|
systems. There are several variants with extended features, notably
|
|
<i>vim</i>, <i>vile</i>,
|
|
<i>elvis</i>, and <i>xvi</i>;
|
|
of these <i>vim</i> is probably the most popular
|
|
and is found on many Linux<a id="id2979464" class="indexterm"/> systems. All the variants are rather
|
|
similar and share a core command set unchanged from the original
|
|
<i>vi</i>.</p><p>Ports of <i>vi</i> are available for the
|
|
Windows operating systems<a id="id2979493" class="indexterm"/> and MacOS<a id="id2979501" class="indexterm"/>.</p><p>Most introductory Unix books include a chapter describing basic
|
|
<i>vi</i> usage. One place a <i>vi</i> FAQ is available
|
|
is the <a href="http://www.faqs.org/faqs/editor-faq/vi/" target="_top">Editor
|
|
FAQ/vi</a>; you can find many other copies with a WWW keyword
|
|
search for page titles including “vi” and
|
|
“FAQ”.</p></div><div class="sect2" lang="en"><div class="titlepage"><div><h3 class="title"><a id="id2979540"/>Useful Things to Know about Emacs</h3></div></div><p><i>Emacs</i> stands for ‘EDiting
|
|
MACroS’ (pronounce it <span class="phonetic">/ee´·maks/</span>). It was originally
|
|
written in the late 1970s as a set of macros in an editor called TECO,
|
|
then reimplemented several times in different ways. In an amusing
|
|
twist, modern Emacs implementations include a TECO emulation
|
|
mode.</p><p>In our earlier discussion of editors and optional complexity, we
|
|
noted that many people consider Emacs
|
|
excessively heavyweight. However, investing the time to learn it can
|
|
yield rich rewards in productivity. Emacs
|
|
supports many powerful editing modes that offer help with the syntax
|
|
of various programming languages and markups. We'll see later in this
|
|
chapter how Emacs can be used in
|
|
combination with other development tools to give capabilities
|
|
comparable to (and in many ways surpassing) those of conventional
|
|
IDEs.</p><p>The standard Emacs, universally
|
|
available on modern Unixes, is <i>GNU Emacs</i>;
|
|
this is what generally runs if you type <b>emacs</b> to a
|
|
Unix shell prompt. GNU Emacs sources and documentation are available
|
|
at the <a href="ftp://gnu.org/pub/gnu" target="_top">Free Software Foundation
|
|
archive site</a><a id="id2979609" class="indexterm"/>.</p><p>The only major variant is called
|
|
<i>XEmacs</i>; it has a better X interface but
|
|
otherwise quite similar capabilities (it forked from Emacs
|
|
19). <i>XEmacs</i> has a <a href="http://www.xemacs.org" target="_top">home page</a>.
|
|
Emacs (and Emacs Lisp) is universally
|
|
available under modern Unixes. It has been ported to MS-DOS (where it
|
|
works poorly) and Windows 95 and NT (where it is said to work
|
|
reasonably well).</p><p>Emacs includes its own interactive
|
|
tutorial and very complete on-line documentation; you'll find
|
|
instructions on how to invoke both on the default
|
|
Emacs startup screen. A good introduction
|
|
on paper is <i>Learning GNU Emacs</i> [<a href="apb.html#Cameron" title="[Cameron]">Cameron</a>].</p><p>The keystroke commands used in the Unix ports of
|
|
Netscape/Mozilla and Internet Explorer text windows (in forms and the
|
|
mailer) are copied from the stock Emacs
|
|
bindings for basic text editing. These bindings are the closest thing
|
|
to a cross-platform standard for editor keystrokes.</p></div><div class="sect2" lang="en"><div class="titlepage"><div><h3 class="title"><a id="id2979678"/>The Antireligious Choice: Using Both</h3></div></div><p>Many people who regularly use both <i>vi</i> and
|
|
Emacs tend to use them for different
|
|
things, and find it valuable to know both.</p><p>In general, <i>vi</i> is best for small jobs
|
|
— quick replies to mail, simple tweaks to system configuration,
|
|
and the like. It is especially useful when you're using a new system
|
|
(or a remote one over a network) and don't have your
|
|
Emacs customization files handy.</p><p>Emacs comes into its own for extended
|
|
editing sessions in which you have to handle complex tasks, modify
|
|
multiple files, and use results from other programs during the
|
|
session. For programmers using X on their console (which is typical on
|
|
modern Unixes), it's normal to start up
|
|
Emacs shortly after login time in a large
|
|
window and leave it running forever, possibly visiting dozens of files
|
|
and even running programs in multiple Emacs
|
|
subwindows.</p></div></div><div class="navfooter"><hr/><table width="100%" summary="Navigation footer"><tr><td width="40%" align="left"><a accesskey="p" href="ch15s01.html">Prev</a> </td><td width="20%" align="center"><a accesskey="u" href="toolschapter.html">Up</a></td><td width="40%" align="right"> <a accesskey="n" href="ch15s03.html">Next</a></td></tr><tr><td width="40%" align="left" valign="top">A Developer-Friendly Operating System </td><td width="20%" align="center"><a accesskey="h" href="index.html">Home</a></td><td width="40%" align="right" valign="top"> Special-Purpose Code Generators</td></tr></table></div></body></html>
|
|
|