Mixing vocabularies of RSS feeds and an API is confusing #10

Open
opened 2022-02-21 14:23:33 +01:00 by mb · 0 comments

After reading the "Becoming Sponge" article about Constant's feminist infrastructure, it made me realise that logics of a feed (RSS) and lock and key (API) mechanisms are very different. Mixing these two terms in the description of the Multifeeder feels weird and contradictory now.

In 2006, Twitter announced itself as a “micro-blogging” site. In another case of embrace, extend, and extinguish, Twitter initially made extensive use of RSS, allowing the service to co-occupy a space with other blogging practices. By 2013, with a deeply established base of users, the service “upgraded their API,” dropping its RSS feeds and following an industry trend to only offer feeds or other structured data via an “authenticated API.” This means that aggregators not only need to include Twitter-specific code but also need to use a so-called API key: a user-specific password given in response to an individual (click) signing a legal agreement stipulating that if the terms of the API are not followed, the key can be revoked. In other words, protocols designed literally to feed a distributed community of practice are replaced by the lock and key logic of non-negotiable terms protecting the interests of increasingly centralized and commercial services.

https://march.international/becoming-sponge-sustaining-practice-through-protocols-of-web-publishing/

After reading the "Becoming Sponge" article about Constant's feminist infrastructure, it made me realise that logics of *a feed* (RSS) and *lock and key* (API) mechanisms are very different. Mixing these two terms in the description of the Multifeeder feels weird and contradictory now. > In 2006, Twitter announced itself as a “micro-blogging” site. In another case of embrace, extend, and extinguish, Twitter initially made extensive use of RSS, allowing the service to co-occupy a space with other blogging practices. By 2013, with a deeply established base of users, the service “upgraded their API,” dropping its RSS feeds and following an industry trend to only offer feeds or other structured data via an “authenticated API.” This means that aggregators not only need to include Twitter-specific code but also need to use a so-called API key: a user-specific password given in response to an individual (click) signing a legal agreement stipulating that if the terms of the API are not followed, the key can be revoked. In other words, protocols designed literally to feed a distributed community of practice are replaced by the lock and key logic of non-negotiable terms protecting the interests of increasingly centralized and commercial services. https://march.international/becoming-sponge-sustaining-practice-through-protocols-of-web-publishing/
mb changed title from Mixing vocabularies of feeds and API is confusing to Mixing vocabularies of RSS feeds and API is confusing 2022-02-21 14:23:58 +01:00
mb changed title from Mixing vocabularies of RSS feeds and API is confusing to Mixing vocabularies of RSS feeds and an API is confusing 2022-02-21 14:24:10 +01:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Label
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: varia/multifeeder#10
No description provided.