You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
37 lines
4.3 KiB
37 lines
4.3 KiB
4 years ago
|
Title: Introduction - Digital Infrapuncture
|
||
4 years ago
|
Slug: 01-s1-introduction-digital-infrapuncture
|
||
4 years ago
|
Date: 2020-11-01 12:00
|
||
4 years ago
|
Summary: *Digital infrapuncture* is a term that draws attention to stress points in infrastructures and stimulates thinking about how to intervene. As private, corporate infrastructures slowly encroach on the public realm, they may enable privacy breaches through user data extraction, or determine the agency of the user, or may perpetuate systemic inequalities through their very design. Paying attention to the harms they produce is paramount.
|
||
4 years ago
|
|
||
4 years ago
|
As private, corporate infrastructures slowly encroach on the public realm, they may enable privacy breaches through user data extraction, or determine the agency of the user, or may perpetuate systemic inequalities through their very design. Paying attention to the harms they produce is paramount.
|
||
4 years ago
|
|
||
4 years ago
|
*Digital infrapuncture* is a term that draws attention to what could be defined as stress points in infrastructures and stimulates thinking about how to intervene. In a talk she presented in 2016 called *Identifying the point of it all: Towards a Model of "Digital Infrapuncture"*[^DigitalInfrapuncture], Deb Verhoeven develops this concept in relation to the field of digital humanities. In her talk she gives the example of the Greek and Italian cinemas that appeared in Melbourne before the invention of the video tape and the influence they have had over the influx and self-organisation of the Italian and Greek immigrants living in Australia at the time. Her research concluded that these small cinemas that only screened subtitled Italian and Greek movies led to an increase in migrant population from those areas. Similarly, the shutting down of a cinema coincided with the dispersion of the immigrant community in the neighbourhood. She uses this example to illustrate the importance of alterations in infrastructures for social and cultural exchange.
|
||
4 years ago
|
|
||
4 years ago
|
Informed by the work of scholar Bethany Nowviskie[^Nowviskie], Verhoeven asks for a rethinking of digital infrastructures in terms of capacity and care, by "developing an appreciation for where it hurts, where the sense of pain is in the worlds that we inhabit and study" and creating small scale interventions which can enkindle transformation on a larger scale.
|
||
4 years ago
|
|
||
4 years ago
|
In her presentation, she describes digital infrastructures according to their:
|
||
4 years ago
|
|
||
4 years ago
|
* capacity to create the **conditions of possibility for connection**
|
||
4 years ago
|
* their capacity for **repair**[^Jackson]
|
||
4 years ago
|
* and their capacity to **bring things (back) together**
|
||
4 years ago
|
|
||
4 years ago
|
<!-- ![A screenshot of the last slide from Verhoeven's presentation.](images/slide.png) -->
|
||
4 years ago
|
|
||
4 years ago
|
This definition of digital infrastructures favours their community-making capacities. It centers the desire for an infrastructure to recover from moments of stress and continue existing for the benefit of the community who participates in it. If we understand an infrastructure as a relational structure - or in other words - as a technology that brings things (back) together, we can start to critically enquire where infrastructures fail to do so.
|
||
4 years ago
|
|
||
4 years ago
|
How does an infrastructure connect? And how are these connections constructed and formatted?
|
||
4 years ago
|
|
||
4 years ago
|
Who is an infrastructure bringing together? And who is excluded from this process? What are the conditions and possibilities for connection they provide?
|
||
4 years ago
|
|
||
4 years ago
|
And, most importantly, *who* has the access and agency to actually intervene in the design of infrastructures? And *how*?
|
||
4 years ago
|
|
||
|
<br>
|
||
|
|
||
4 years ago
|
# Footnotes
|
||
4 years ago
|
|
||
|
[^DigitalInfrapuncture]: Verhoeven, Deb. "Opening Keynote: Identifying the point of it all: Towards a Model of 'Digital Infrapuncture'" *Digital Humanities at Oxford Summer School* (2016) [https://podcasts.ox.ac.uk/opening-keynote-identifying-point-it-all-towards-model-digital-infrapuncture](https://podcasts.ox.ac.uk/opening-keynote-identifying-point-it-all-towards-model-digital-infrapuncture)
|
||
|
|
||
|
[^Nowviskie]: Nowviskie, Bethany. "On Capacity and Care" *Bethany Nowviskie* (2015) Accessed 18 September, 2020. [http://nowviskie.org/2015/on-capacity-and-care/](http://nowviskie.org/2015/on-capacity-and-care/)
|
||
4 years ago
|
|
||
4 years ago
|
[^Jackson]: Jackson, Steven J. "Rethinking Repair" *Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society* (2014): 221-239. [https://sjackson.infosci.cornell.edu/Jackson_RethinkingRepair(MITPress2014).pdf](https://sjackson.infosci.cornell.edu/Jackson_RethinkingRepair(MITPress2014).pdf)
|